Supply-chain evidence

NIS2 reaches suppliers too.

Who asks, what they want — and when.

Who asksWhat's requiredWhen
OEM / major customerStructured supply-chain security questionnaireAt tender or onboarding
Cyber insurerEvidence for underwriting and renewalAt policy renewal
Contract clauseAssurance + ongoing proof of measuresAt contract signing
Audit requestEvidence on demand, often on a short deadlineAs triggered

What an OEM questionnaire actually asks.

Questionnaires differ in the detail, but nearly all cover the same eight areas — the same themes as the ten §30 measures: information security organised and documented · access control and multi-factor authentication · patch and vulnerability management · backup and recovery · incident detection and reporting · security of your own sub-suppliers · staff awareness and training · physical and environmental security. For each area, customers don't want a statement of intent — they want evidence: what's true at your company, where it's documented, since when, and who owns it.

What happens if you can't deliver.

No fine from the regulator — but real commercial consequences: you drop out of the tender, onboarding stalls, insurance gets more expensive, or you breach a contract clause. Increasingly, evidence is what decides whether you stay a supplier.

The minimum evidence package.

Not an 80-page security concept. A short, auditable package is enough — and more convincing: a structured overview of your §30-relevant measures · one concrete piece of evidence per measure · a date · a named contact. Kept current, not filed once and forgotten.

Prepared in four steps.

Effort and cost.

For most suppliers the main cost is internal time, not external fees — the evidence comes from systems you already run. Budget a few person-days across your IT and quality teams for a first package. External help only pays off for genuine edge cases.

Next step.

First clarify your own scope, then map the relevant §30 measures in the obligations matrix.

FAQ

Do I owe evidence if I'm not directly in scope?

Yes, if a regulated customer requires it by contract. The contractual duty applies regardless of your own direct scope.

Is a one-time questionnaire enough?

Rarely. Contracts increasingly require ongoing proof — the status has to stay current, not just be true at onboarding.

Do I need a certification (ISO 27001, TISAX)?

Not necessarily. Some customers accept structured self-assessments backed by evidence. Ask what's specifically required before starting a certification project.

What if I have sub-suppliers of my own?

Then you pass the relevant requirements down — the same logic applies one tier deeper.